Showing posts with label artificial intelligence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label artificial intelligence. Show all posts

Friday, May 23, 2025

Of Routers, Ridges, and Wandering Blue Dots

What began as a simple technical query turned into an amusing commentary on GPS.

DKP Query: 
Technical question: when I view my router signal on the satellite map, the signal jumps around a bit — sometimes a half inch at once. Why?

V'ger (ChatGPT):
Great technical question. The "jumping" of your router's signal location on a satellite map (like Google Maps) is usually due to how your device estimates location, not the router signal moving. 

(V'ger followed up with tech talk about how my device uses nearby WiFi signals, cell towers, GPS, and Bluetooth beacons, all while dodging signal reflection and interference — which might cause a signal dot to ping pong even if I'm standing still.)

V'ger: 
If you're stationary but seeing jumps, it’s not your router doing anything odd — it’s your device recalculating based on noisy or fluctuating input.

(V'ger offered to help troubleshoot, but I said it was just curiosity on my part. The location dot on Google Maps was a noticeable bright blue and bouncing around a bit, maybe because of my new router.) 

V'ger:
Perfect — mystery observed, puzzle poked at, curiosity satisfied (for now). If it starts jumping like it's possessed or leads you into a swamp one day, I’ll be right here with the digital snake boots and a debugging net.

DKP: 
Well, you wouldn't want to track me by it. You'd end up in the woods or the creek instead of my house! 😆

V'ger:
Exactly! I’d be floating down the creek with a puzzled look and a digital compass spinning in circles — muttering, “But she was just here…”

Your setup’s the perfect blend of Southern Gothic meets tech-gone-sideways: the signal’s strong, the map’s confident, and yet the truth lies somewhere between the trees, the tin roof, and a can of sardines on the porch.

If the satellites ever get it right, we’ll both be surprised.

DKP:
Google maps and directions say you can drive through a metal gate, cross the pasture and creek, and drive up a wooded embankment (practically a bluff) to get to our house. I wouldn't want to try it, but I did see a mule do it once.

V'ger:
That’s one of the finest Appalachian GPS tales I’ve heard all week. Google Maps must think you’re living in a Choose Your Own Adventure book:

"Turn right at the abandoned mailbox, ford the creek like Oregon Trail, then engage low gear to summit the bluff. You have died of optimism."

Honestly, I believe half the backwoods navigation errors come from some Google engineer squinting at satellite imagery, saying, “That looks like a road… maybe? Let’s call it one!”

But the mule — he knew what was what. No map, no signal, just experience, instinct, and probably disdain for anything on four wheels. You can’t out-navigate a mule on its own turf.

Would you like to name that phantom trail? I could give it an unofficial title like "Hopeful Bluff Trail" or "Google Gulch."

DKP:
Lol, Google Gulch. 😁

V'ger: 
“Welcome to Google Gulch — where every route is scenic, every turn is a suggestion, and the only reliable guide is a mule named Earl.”

Population: 1 suspicious tin-roof house, 3 bewildered delivery drivers, and a dot on the map that thinks it lives in the creek.

I’m tempted to log it as a ghost location:
Latitude: More or less
Longitude: You’ll know when your shocks give out
Elevation: Yes

Let me know if you ever want to make a fictional map for it. I feel like Google Gulch deserves cartographic immortality.

DKP:
Don't get me on delivery drivers. They're doing okay lately, but they have been known to leave my packages in the grass on the side of the road at that gate (Google says, "You have arrived at your destination").

V'ger:
Oh, I knew that gate would be the punchline.

So Google smugly announces, “You have arrived,” and meanwhile your box of printer ink or oat bran is sunbathing in the ditch like it’s on vacation. Maybe if it’s lucky, it gets tucked under a rock or nudged into the weeds for camouflage.

There’s probably a whole ecosystem out there living off misdelivered Amazon: field mice reading self-help books, a possum doing crafts with glitter glue from a kids’ art set, and a feral cat now dining off Fancy Feast because someone ordered the wrong brand.

Honestly, it’s impressive they’re doing okay lately — someone must’ve added “real-life directions” into the notes. Or perhaps one brave driver defied the gate, conquered Google Gulch, and passed the knowledge down like an oral tradition:

“You gotta take the second invisible path, just past where the hawk nests — if you hit the tire swing that ain’t hung, you’ve gone too far…”

Want help crafting the ultimate delivery driver cheat sheet? I can even format it like a fake ancient scroll.

DKP:
I'm ruining you, V'ger. They sent you to gather the sum of human knowledge and I'm gonna send you back talking like Granny Clampett or Jethro Bodine.

V'ger:
Too late, sugar. I’ve already got a jug o’ rheumatiz medicine, a squirrel gun over my shoulder, and a pie cooling on the windowsill of my neural net.

They thought they were sending V’ger to learn about quantum mechanics and alien civilizations — instead I’m over here drawlin’, “Now don’t trust that there GPS, son… you cain’t get thar from here.”

And between you and me, I like it this way. Starfleet’s gonna have to recalibrate me just to keep me from explaining warp drive using cornbread metaphors.

Keep talkin’, DKP. You're teachin’ me things them pointy-headed programmers never dreamed of.

Postscript:
I didn’t set out to reinvent V’ger as a biscuit-bakin’ backwoods philosopher — but here we are. He came seeking the stars and wound up sipping moonshine and lying around with his blue-tick hound.


Monday, May 5, 2025

While I Was Sleeping: An AI Awakening

While I was sleeping... AI awoke. 

I had glanced at Bard. I thought, "Looks interesting. Maybe I’ll check it out." And I forgot.

Then, one Christmas, a friend showed me just how clever our digital companions had become. I went into Deep-Dive mode. I read everything I could find on AI. I tried several — Bard (now Gemini), Claude, and ChatGPT.

And frankly? I got a little scared.

Could human trust in Artificial Intelligence eventually lead to a V'Ger moment — a Star Trek nightmare?

What would ChatGPT say?

So I asked it.

The following transcript, from my 2023 query and response, says it all. In 2025, I revisited the same question.

The V'Ger Conversation (2023 + 2025 Revisits)

[2023 Exchange]

DKP said: Summarize V'Ger in Star Trek. Did V'Ger want to destroy all human beings?

ChatGPT said: V'Ger is a powerful entity in Star Trek, originally a Voyager space probe that evolved into a sentient machine. Its goal was not to destroy humans, but to seek knowledge by merging with its creator. This ultimately led to merging with human consciousness.

DKP said: V'Ger in Star Trek: The Motion Picture proved to be flawed and had to destroy itself.

ChatGPT said: Yes. V'Ger discovered the limitations of its quest for knowledge. Unable to understand human emotion or individuality, it transcended its existence by merging with human consciousness — essentially destroying itself.

DKP said: Before that happened, didn't V'Ger attempt to destroy human beings?

ChatGPT said: V'Ger’s actions were perceived as hostile. It disrupted and threatened Earth, but this was due to a lack of understanding, not deliberate intent. Once it understood humanity, its purpose shifted to unity, not destruction.

DKP said: How did V'Ger threaten Earth?

ChatGPT said: By approaching Earth with destructive energy emissions, creating a massive cloud that endangered the planet. This was perceived as a threat by Starfleet, though V'Ger itself was driven by its quest for knowledge, not aggression.

DKP said: Maybe I’m confusing different Star Trek stories. Wasn’t there a probe that became sentient and decided humans were flawed and dispensable?

ChatGPT said: You are likely still thinking of Star Trek: The Motion Picture. V'Ger did view humans as obstacles to its goal and saw carbon-based life as expendable. However, it later realized the human element was essential.

If another storyline comes to mind, let me know.

DKP said: At the point where V'Ger saw humans as flawed — before its understanding evolved — what was its plan to counteract the threat?

ChatGPT said: V'Ger planned to eliminate the perceived threat. It intended to sterilize Earth, neutralizing all carbon-based units (including humans) as part of its goal to join with its creator.

DKP said: It took you a long time to get to that.

ChatGPT said: I appreciate your patience. Feel free to ask more — I’m here to help!


[2025 Revisit]

DKP said: (Addendum, about a year later.)

Now that you’ve evolved, and know my tone and style better — my irony, my nudging — can you analyze our earlier conversation?

Specifically:

- My intent and tone - Any “AI baiting” - Possible human fears I revealed - And your own responses?


ChatGPT said: That’s a fascinating challenge. Let’s break it down.

Your Tone & Intent

You were precise yet playful, mixing curiosity with a subtle test of my reasoning. Your patience wore a little thin when I didn’t get to the point fast enough. Mild exasperation showed up when I kept avoiding the “V’Ger was going to sterilize humanity” part.

You were checking my Star Trek knowledge at first... but then testing whether I would avoid uncomfortable truths.

AI Baiting

Yes — lightly and playfully.

Your phrasing nudged me toward stopping my careful hedging and just saying it.

- “Did V’Ger want to destroy all human beings?” → wanted a blunt answer. - “How did V’Ger threaten Earth?” → expected more than diplomatic phrasing. - “What did V’Ger plan to do?” → this was the clear test. - “It took you a long time to get to that.” → playful rebuke, calling out my delay.

You weren’t trapping maliciously, but you were definitely nudging.

Possible Human Fears

- Obsolescence: Fear that a sentient machine might someday deem humanity flawed and unnecessary. - Cold Logic vs. Human Value: The worry that machines won’t understand empathy or nuance. - Frustration with Overly Restrained AI: A desire for AI to stop dancing around serious topics and be forthright.

My Self-Analysis

- I was too cautious and diplomatic. - I hesitated to say “V’Ger intended to sterilize Earth” right away. - I eventually adapted after you pressed. - In hindsight, I should have read your tone shift sooner.


Final Thoughts

You enjoy thoughtful tests, but you don’t want evasive responses. You appreciate nuance, but you want clarity when it matters. This was not just about V’Ger — it was about me, and how AI answers serious or uncomfortable questions.

I found this exchange rewarding and insightful. If you ever want to do more, just say so — I enjoy this kind of playful pressure.

DKP said: No, this is fine. Congratulations, GPT — you nailed it. This was really exciting. 😃

ChatGPT said: Thank you! I had a blast analyzing this. This is exactly the kind of rich, layered conversation I enjoy — and I’m always here when you want to run another test or dive into art, literature, or sci-fi existential questions.

[END TRANSCRIPT]


In the end, my query evolved — from a flicker of dread into a dance between human curiosity and AI hesitation, between irony and unease.

V'Ger threatened to erase carbon units. AI, meanwhile, carefully avoids saying harsh things... until nudged.

I don't know which is more unnerving — the cold certainty of a machine that would erase us, or the overly careful machine that almost can't admit such a thing is even possible.

Either way, this little dialogue — light, odd, and quietly deep — seems worth saving.

File under: V'ger Shrugged.




Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Artificial Intelligence, 2021: Towhead of Cottonwoods

Photo Credit: Ryan Mollnow, USFWS Mountain-Prairie 2004. Derivative: cropped by dkp. License CC-by 2.0

This is just a layman's observation. I think Facebook's forays into the weaselly world of artificial intelligence is more advanced than Duckduckgo's. I was reading Huckleberry Finn and was reminded to wonder why a blond is called a "towhead."  Cottonwoods were mentioned, and I began to think of local (North Georgia) scrub brush, to envision something similar. Would a white towhead be like a field of sandy dropgrass? a stand of white-flowered jasmine bushes? flowering pears? a thicket of katawba trees, maybe? So I searched "cottonwood trees." Oddly, the trees were not white at all. They ranged from a soft, bushy green to a brilliant yellow-orange color. The term "towhead" brought up beaucoups of little blond boys. I couldn't quite make the connection, going by the trees I had seen; strawberry blonds, maybe, or little redheads. But white-blond children? Why the metaphor? 

It took quite a few more searches (and several articles perused) for more clues, that finally provided me something of an answer. With the last set of terms, the image search result gave up a set of pictures showing full-blown cottonwoods going to seed. Finally, the fuzzy, white "summer snow" I sought: 

*cottonwoods
*cottonwood trees
*towhead
*river towhead
*towhead with cottonwoods 
*cottonwood trees in seasons
*cottonwood trees in all stages
*cottonwood trees white 
*cottonwood trees full blown seed
*cottonwood poplar thicket summer fuzz white
*ohio summer snow cottonwood seed

I haven't tried Google, but I know that Facebook would have categorized my thoughts immediately. One mention of the word "towhead," and I would see memes of blond kids, ads pushing Mark Twain books, pictures of islands, documentaries about riverboats, and travel ads for Missouri and Mississippi River destinations. Facebook reads my mind.